The current commercial process in the world today is a game, is created entirely in the realm of FICTION, operating as private law and private contract between legal fictions, i.e., Countries (Nations,) Corporations, and straw men (Individuals/Sole Proprietors.)

Today’s operational jurisdiction is private law, called “public policy,” not public law as existed in the Republic. To make his way in the Real world a living being, who cannot enter, operate in, or be in the realm of the fictitious and imaginary, needs a commercial vessel.

Such a vessel is the straw man.

You have never had standing to be in, or to act in their commercial court… until now. You are not JOHN HENRY DOE (name changed to protect the “person” lol), and you never were. You are the man who has created a new person to use in commerce, with standing to sue all those who trespass against you or your person (your new fictional entity that you created… what you create, you control). Now it is your commercial “person” whom you use in commerce to conduct your business. You now have good standing (where you did not before) to sue anyone in their individual capacity who violates that person or it’s property. You have successfully separated your body from your participation in commerce and as such can now hand them the person (the ANC) if they want to ask it any questions. Believe me, this rebuts and clarifies many presumptions that are made in court and will do nothing but help you. Include your title and number on all correspondence. I even write correspondence using the all caps person now. I am trying to build it’s credit.

Inasmuch as law must always provide a remedy, when US Inc. declared bankruptcy in 1933, it had to structure a means for living people to appear in their private, proper capacity and deal with whatever claims might arise. The result is that all claims must be resolved through private administrative process to determine whether or not the public sector (public policy) has jurisdiction in a given matter.

Consequently, in order to properly bring or deal with an action in the public sector, the private, administrative remedies must properly be exhausted first. The real being cannot perfect his claim and assert any standing as a creditor in the absence of perfecting the private administrative process, hereinafter “PAP,” first.

Inasmuch as all courts today are admiralty-equity tribunals, the universal principles of equity are operational. These principles include such maxims of equity as:

1. He who comes into a court of equity must come with clean hands. 79 Fed. Rep. 854; 97 Tenn. 180; 11 Tex. Civ. App. 624.

2. He who has committed iniquity shall not have equity. Francis, 2d Max.

3. Equity denotes the spirit and habit of fairness, justness, and right dealing, which would regulate the intercourse of men with men.

4. Equity suffers no right without a remedy.

5. Equality is equity.

6. Equity follows the law.

7. He who seeks equity must do equity.

8. He who seeks equity must have clean hands.

9. Equity will not permit a party to profit by his own wrong.

10. To receive equity one must give equity.

If, in an action, both parties are in dishonor, both have failed to “give equity” and have proceeded without “clean hands.” In such a case, the judge has unbridled discretion, since he is dealing with two losers from inception. The judge must then do is what his exclusive duty is in any case, uphold public policy and collect revenue for paying the insurance policy premiums to keep the bankrupt corporation afloat.

The solution, therefore, is never to dishonor, i.e., always do equity and act with clean hands, and perfect your claim in the private, administrative realm at the outset of a dispute. By so doing, you have availed yourself of the remedy in law and “exhausted your administrative remedies.” At this point, should the matter enter a court and be put before a judge, you will be the one with a perfected claim on the private side and also the only party with clean hands, having done equity and acted in honor and good faith.

Because administrative remedies must be exhausted prior to a matter entering the judicial arena, as long as you are doing administrative procedure, the public officials cannot proceed with any court action against the straw man.

The administrative process consists of having your notary send (you should always send and receive all paperwork by and through a friendly and knowledgeable notary) notice of your position to all of the parties, i.e., “Respondents,” who are assaulting your straw man with demands, obligations, and charges. Said Respondents are sent your private, administrative notices in the private capacity of all concerned, so that you are operating as a real being sending notices to other real beings. The nature of your paperwork is that without dishonoring (denying, traversing, faultfinding, etc.), you require that your adversary “put up or shut up.” In other words, you send your adversaries, in private capacity, conditional acceptances and negative averments that in essence state:

I have no idea whether your claims and charges are bona fide or not, or whether I have a valid obligation to satisfy the obligations you assert, but I am not aware of any evidence substantiating your position in any of these matters and if you claim that your demands are valid, provide documentary proof of claim for the record and I will comply with whatever you have substantiated.”

It is essential to remember that the entire current judicial system functions by stipulations, i.e., agreements, between disputing parties. Either stipulations occur by the two parties openly agreeing on a particular point or, if they do not, the discovery and trial process resulting in stipulations based on the ruling of the judge, i.e., the discretionary “conscience of the court.”

The entire legal/commercial process today is a game, the essential rule of which is: “Whoever dishonors first loses.” Or, phrased differently, “No one who dishonors can be assured of prevailing.” In short, if you wish to win you must proceed without dishonoring, or there is no guarantee you will prevail and, what is worse, if your adversary is the system itself, you are automatically guaranteed to lose because the judge must faithfully adhere to his Prime Directive: Uphold public policy and collect revenue for the bankruptcy reorganization.

Three step process: Conditional acceptance, Notice of fault and opportunity to cure, notice of default.

Your private administrative process must operate as follows:

1. Do everything by affidavit or asseveration, notarized.

2. Use a notary for everything—sending out all of your paperwork, receiving responses, keeping the notarial logbook, retaining copies of everything sent and received, executing such notarial documents as those involved in a notary protest, etc.

3. Have your notary send your adversaries your notices in the private capacity of all involved parties.

4. Never dishonor or traverse, which you can do by enjoining (commenting on, whether admitting or denying) any of the content, i.e., subject matter, in their communications, as well as by ignoring what you receive (failing to respond within the time frames required). Remember the definition of “traverser” from Black’s Law Dictionary: “In pleading, one who traverses or denies. A prisoner or party indicted; so called from his traversing the indictment.” Regard the content of their documents as their truth or fantasy, which, in either case, is not your position/truth and therefore not your business to comment on one way or another, other than as above, “maybe what you say is true, but if so, prove it.” Then you have not dishonored by ignoring, nor traversed by commenting on their statements.

5. Remember the maxim of law: “The burden of proof resides on him who asserts, not on one against whom a claim or charge is made.” They initiated the matter and are demanding something from you, not the reverse. Therefore, in the Private Administrative Process the burden of proof concerning the validity of their assertions rests with them, not you.

6. Invoke the principle of acquiescence by silence, i.e., by the terms and conditions of the interchange, their failure to put up or shut up within the time frame you allow for them to prove their claims constitutes their stipulation (agreement) that your position is true, correct, and complete in entirety and they are devoid of proof of claim for anything they’ve alleged against the straw man.

7. After you have consummated your private administrative process, proceed to the public side by invoking the notary for the notarial protest process, at the end of which you have the following established as documentary proof on the record:

a. A private (from you) and public (from the notary) exhaustion of administrative remedies;

b. A complete set of stipulations by them in support of your position;

c. Private, commercial, and judicial summary judgment and judgment in estoppel on the law, facts, and money.

Their stipulations established by the foregoing process include their admission and confession, i.e., “confession of judgment,” that:

1. You are the creditor and not a debtor concerning the transaction;

2. There is no evidence that they are the creditor;

3. They owe you, and you can bill them for, the sum-certain amount set forth in the paperwork;

4. They have failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted;

5. Any and all proceeding against you thereafter constitutes a libel on the public record authorizing your filing a libel of review in the (general) admiralty against all parties in their private capacity, devoid of official immunity;

6. They and all others are hereafter forever estopped from raising the issue, contesting the stipulations, or proceeding against you in any way concerning what has been finalized.

After completion of the above, you can file your administrative judgment with the appropriate Recorder, and thereafter record a certified copy of the filed judgment on a UCC-1 or UCC-3.

Remember that your notary constitutes a disinterested third-party witness. When the notary, an agent of the State and the court, enters the public side with your private information, your position appears on the public record.

Thereafter, any form of court action against your straw man would constitute self-validating proof, based on the public record that has been established, that any and all involved parties — are acting inequitably and with unclean hands. If you have any form of court proceeding asserted against you, show the judge that he has only one course of action based on the record.

Once the Private Administrative Process has been completed, then all manner of remedies and recourses exist for you that formerly did not and could not. These include a habeas corpus, criminal affidavits, maritime liens, and other remedies.

Here is a sample notice of fault and opportunity to cure that you can make your own:


To: ______________________.

From: ____________________.

Date Notice served:

Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal. Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent

Dear _______________________,

I,__________________________ do declare the following to be true and correct to the best of my knowledge;
This is a lawful notice. Please read it carefully. It informs you. It means what it says. I do not stand under the Law Society’s ‘legalese’ and there are no hidden meanings or interpretations beyond the simple English statements herein.

A reply to this notice is REQUIRED and is to be made stating the respondent’s clearly legible full name and on his or her full commercial liability and penalty of perjury. Your response is required within TEN (10) days from the recorded delivery date of this notice; failure to respond in substance will provide your tacit consent to all of the FACTS contained within this Notice and or any previous Notice served; and that you agree that you are unable to provide lawful proof-of-claim to the contrary. DO NOT IGNORE IT.

You are hereby again put on Notice of my standing and the lawful facts. If you fail to respond to the aforesaid Notices in ‘substance’ or within the reasonable time frame provided herein, without first legally rebutting the points of law claimed herein or within previous Notice(s) served, it shall be taken to mean by all interested parties that all claims and assertions stated by me herein/therein are true and indisputable lawful facts and, that you agree to them entirely and without exception. It will also be taken to mean that any further action taken against myself as a living constitutional subject of the Realm of England and or, against the fraudulently created ‘legal fiction’, shall be taken to mean by all interested parties to be harassment, demanding monies with menaces and coercion to aid and abet crime (High Treason) at common law.

I,___________________ over the age of twenty one years, whilst mentally competent to witness, and with first hand knowledge of the facts do say the following, that:


This being the second Notice to be served I use this ‘Notice of Default and Opportunity to Cure’ as a reminder of the first preceding Notice of Conditional Acceptance, which was either ignored or mislaid, or was not answered correctly according to the claims and assertions stated within it in ‘SUBSTANCE’.

Allowing for a reasonable time frame for you to respond to this ‘Notice of Default and Opportunity to Cure’, I hereby offer you this further chance to rebut or confirm my understanding of the common law as referred to in my previous Notice(s) so that you may remain in honour, and thus by doing so enabling an opportunity to remedy this matter by law, amicably so as to save any future breach of the peace or torts being committed.

I hereby attest and affirm that all of the above is the truth and as to my lawful understanding.

Without malice, vexation, frivolity or ill will, and on my full commercial liability and penalty of perjury and, with no admission of liability whatsoever and with my natural, indefeasible and unalienable Common law rights reserved.Sworn and subscribed on the date:


Witnessed by: Date:



3: _____________________

Learn more about affidavits: