Does the Court Automatically Have Jurisdiction?

Attorneys would have you believe that the court always automatically has jurisdiction according to a geographic border. If the “STATE OF OREGON” essentially is composed of articles of incorporation on paper that is commonly referred to as the Oregon Constitution, what does that have to do with the inhabitants or land?

My question is, how exactly does a piece of paper (Oregon Constitution), that I have not ever nor will I ever be a party to, give authority to a commercial entity to prosecute me without a victim or valid cause of action? Answer: it doesn’t.

The only duty we have delegated to government is the authority to PROTECT and DEFEND rights of the people, not GRANT or REVOKE them.

I think that they would AT LEAST need to show exactly where I agreed to participate in their tribunal with full disclosure and clean hands. If they can’t then I don’t care what they presume about me being their subject, it simply IS NOT TRUE until proven.

Check out how slick Arnold Law Firm is in his motion to dismiss based on subject matter jurisdiction, while at the same time he EXPRESSLY ADMITS PERSONAL JURISDICTION! This is a sneaky attorney move to close doors and lock Ammon Bundy in for the ride. Tell me what you think about this??? And then go ask Mike Arnold of Arnold Law what his strategy was here? Don’t be surprised if he ignores you or implies that you have a mental condition.

Arnold Law Firm playing typical attorney tricks.

Arnold Law Firm playing typical attorney tricks.

It is obvious to me that Mike Arnold is counting on you to remain ignorant. He has put a price tag of almost $14 million to take this case to trial and he stands to lose all that by challenging personal jurisdiction.

Comment excerpts from the same post:

Some comments on Arnold Law Firm post about pricing.
Some comments on Arnold Law Firm post about pricing.

Please contact Arnold Law and demand answers! This attorney’s job is to not let the fish (the client) off of the hook.

Does the government’s constitution say anything about being guaranteed “representation by an attorney”? Or does it protect “assistance of counsel”? Is there a difference between them? What is the difference? And the KICKER – IF there is no requirement in the bill of rights to be “represented by an attorney”, why would an attorney tell you that you HAVE TO be “represented by an attorney”? (PS – The lies they tell wouldn’t work on you if you knew your rights.)

Allow me to present, the Bill of Rights Amendment VI (look at the last sentence):

“In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.”

Does it EVER refer to being “REPRESENTED” by an “ATTORNEY”? Those words do not even appear in the text of the amendment, so my question now is… why do they say that you have to be “REPRESENTED by an ATTORNEY”??? Why are they lying to us? Why are they lying to us?

What they will never tell you is that challenging jurisdiction is one of the best defenses you can make, because if you use the right argument it is almost impossible for you to lose!

In rem jurisdiction (Latin, “power about or against ‘the thing'”) is a legal term describing the power a court may exercise over property (either real or personal) or a “status” against a person over whom the court does not have in personam jurisdiction.

Do they even have the authority to hear the matter?
Do they even have the authority to hear the matter?

If they attempt to tell you that you can’t question their jurisdiction you can easily shut them up with these court rulings!

“Once jurisdiction is challenged, the court cannot proceed when it clearly appears that the court lacks jurisdiction, the court has no authority to reach merits, but, rather, should dismiss the action.” Melo v. US, 505 F2d 1026.
“The law requires proof of jurisdiction to appear on the record of the administrative agency and all administrative proceedings.” Hagans v. Lavine, 415 U. S. 533.
Read US v. Lopez and Hagans v. Levine both void because of lack of jurisdiction. In Lopez the circuit court called it right, and in Hagans it had to go to the Supreme court before it was called right, in both cases, void. Challenge jurisdiction and motion to dismiss, right off the bat. If you read the supreme Court cases you will find that jurisdiction can be challenged at any time and in the case of Lopez it was a jury trial which was declared void for want of jurisdiction. If it [jurisdiction] doesn’t exist, it can not justify conviction or judgment. …without which power (jurisdiction) the state CANNOT be said to be “sovereign.” At best, to proceed would be in “excess” of jurisdiction which is as well fatal to the State’s/ USA ‘s cause. Broom v. Douglas, 75 Ala 268, 57 So 860 the same being jurisdictional facts FATAL to the government’s cause ( e.g. see In re FNB, 152 F 64).

Continue reading “Does the Court Automatically Have Jurisdiction?”

Be Careful Who You Listen to and Trust

Please be careful who you listen to, who you trust. Even be careful with what I say, use your own intuition. After all we are blessed with intuition and the ability to differentiate right from wrong. I would even expect you to question me and what I say, even though I know I would never intentionally lie to you.

The reason why I bring this topic up, is because there are infiltrators and provocateurs out there that are casting huge nets with which to build lists of names of individuals to be used later when larger scale “round ups” of liberty minded patriots begins.

The ones that are the ones that you should suspect first are those who close channels of communication rather that keep them open by responding and communicating with fair, open, and responsive communications. Those who do not respond or respond with slander, orders, negativity, or even just remaining silent are all signs that they may not be someone that you can trust. After all, these agencies and officers of government are only supposed to be there to serve and protect the rights and property of the people. There is no other reason for government, except perhaps defense of the homeland.

These agent provocateurs will also try to keep you in a narrow viewpoint about the situation, and not only will they express a narrow viewpoint, they will usually always try to influence you in a particular way. Sometimes they will try and convince you to not trust a particular individual, sometimes they will exhaustively promote particular individuals or groups.

These plants and government shills also commonly won’t give you a straight answer when you ask them a simple question, and their favorite response is to imply that there is a defect with the complainant to sidestep the actual complaint.

When I talk about those who should be suspected and placed under further scrutiny and background review, I am not just talking about individuals, there may also be shill groups, or organizations. And the ones that should be scrutinized the MOST are those who claim to either be actively affiliated with or employed by government, or those actively promoting ideologies claiming that the government is fair, just, honest, or unbiased.

13133243_244191322636622_309713294813844185_nNaturally those working for the government or benefiting from the government in some way are highly suspect, because they stand to lose the most by withdrawing or losing their support for the broken corrupt system. They are dependent on the government, why challenge it? They will also contradict themselves; for example they may express sympathy and support for the protesters, but at the same time will express support for the government and the “court system” in particular. Like the fox guarding the hen house, they will usually be slick talkers as well. But will rarely offer citations or evidence to prove their claims.

While we are on this subject, I would like to talk briefly about lawyers. And I have more information here if you are interested in learning more. But who has more to lose from the government than a lawyer? Not just any lawyer, but a lawyer that makes his living by arguing cases in government courthouses?

Don’t you think that the government would want to make sure that there were “attorneys” to defend the protesters? Keep them in the casino, where their chances are not good. And by not just any attorneys, but maybe even an attorney from the “Top 100” list of all trial attorneys to prepare their defense. One who has worked their whole career arguing in support of subjects of government who were mainly charged with “code” or “statute” violations. A vast majority of them without a victim, like DUII cases, and other trumped up “code” violations.

I don’t know about you, but after doing years of research on this topic. I have never found in the founding documents where the founders of this country ever suggested or implied that the people were bound by any “code”, “statute”, “rules”, “regulations” or “policy” of government. As a matter of fact the Declaration of Independence says exactly this: “…all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,…” Continue reading “Be Careful Who You Listen to and Trust”

NOTICE of Libel of Review in ADMIRALTY

This is an advanced notice for those looking to seek remedy and/or enforcement from a refusal for cause. If you are not sure what a R4C is, please see this article for more.

The clerk is in authority over the record and therefore has more authority than the judge. The judge may order the clerk but he can only do so within the rules of court. Since the judge is a taxpayer he obviously has no sway and is recused from the case, leaving the court of record (authority) being with the clerk. Refusal for Cause will only work on novations (innovations) and initial presentments. However it works a lot more often that one might expect. What you see with all this privacy invasion is a flurry of R4C’s on the record in the dismissed Libels of Review. If you read any Libel of Review (LoR) you will find an example clerk instruction. If you get a presentment of any form that you do not like then Refuse it for Cause. Put a copy in your evidence repository and include a copy of the clerk instruction back to the presenter. You have done all you can to stop the process. If you are entrenched and the presenter knows it, maybe it will not work. The administrative billing processes are much more voluntary than many would like to believe.


Point 012 B. Affiant has no record or evidence that Affiant is restricted from proceeding in Admiralty Jurisdiction.
ADMIT – Libellee(s) listed within this document admit and agree to the procedures set forth under Admiralty Jurisdiction for settlement and closure to the issues at hand in this instant matter.

EXHIBIT 012 B – NOTICE of Libel of Review in ADMIRALTY

John-Quincy: Jones, lawful man, agent
Real Party in Interest


1. The district court of the United States is the proper venue and has jurisdiction to hear this libel of review. This is a proceeding in Admiralty.

“In this country, revenue causes had so long been the subject of admiralty cognizance, that congress considered them as CIVIL CAUSES OF ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME JURISDICTION, and to preclude any doubt that might arise, carefully added the clause, ‘including’, etc. This is clear proof that congress considered these words to be used in the sense they bore in this country and not in that which they had in England. The Act gives exclusive admiralty and maritime jurisdiction to the district court. As a court of the law of nations…
THE HUNTRESS, 12 Fed. Case 984 @ 992 & 989, (Case No. 6,914) (D. Me. 1840):

2. As further evidence that the action before the court is in fact an Admiralty action we find in UNITED STATES of AMERICA v $3,976.62 in currency, One 1960 Ford Station Wagon Serial No. OC66W145329,

“Although, presumably for purposes of obtaining jurisdiction, action for forfeiture under Internal Revenue Laws is commenced as Proceeding in Admiralty, after jurisdiction is obtained proceeding takes on character of civil action at law, and at least at such stage of proceedings Rules of Civil Procedures control. Continue reading “NOTICE of Libel of Review in ADMIRALTY”

The Shocking Secret About Court Room Flags – It’s A Warning!

The National Flag of the United States, the ‘Stars and Stripes’, is sometimes decorated with gold fringe around the edges.  These yellow fringed ‘Stars and Stripes’ can be found in most State and Federal Courts, Municipal Buildings, and Schools throughout America, but why? militaryflag.gif

The flags displayed in State courts and courts of the United States have gold or yellow fringes. That is your WARNING that you are entering into a foreign jurisdiction, the same as if you are stepping onto foreign soil and you will be under the jurisdiction of THAT flag.  The flag with the gold or yellow fringe has no constitution, no laws, and no rules of any court, and is not recognized by any nation on this earth, and is foreign to you and the United States of America.

Those of us who believe that the Yellow Fringed Flag is the ‘Law of Admiralty’ Flag will know all about this.   For the rest of us, this will be a shocking new disclosure.  President, Dwight David Eisenhower signed Executive Order No.10834 on August 21, 1959 and had printed in the Federal Register at 24 F.R. 6865, pursuant to the law, stated that:  “A military flag is a flag that resembles the regular flag of the United States, except that it has a yellow fringe border on three sides.”

The American people were allowed to believe that it was just a decoration but its not.  When you see a flag that resembles a regular US flag with YELLOW FRINGE border on the edges, it means that you are in a special place.  A place that should not have any jurisdiction over you if you are a normal citizen.  The President of the United States designates this difference from the regular flag, by executive order such as Ike did, and in his capacity as Commander-in-Chief of the military he makes it so.  The placing of a fringe on the national flag, the dimensions of the flag and the arrangement of the stars in the union are matters of detail not controlled by statute, but are within the discretion of the President as Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy.

If you walk onto a ship docked in a port located in New York City you are subject to the laws of the city and state of New York as well as the Federal Laws of the United States.  This is as one would expect.  When that ship leaves that harbor, then things change.  Got it now?  Wherever that ship happens to come to rest the law of the land wherever you happen to be has jurisdiction over you.  When out in the high seas past the twelve mile limit you are not under the jurisdiction of any nation’s laws.  You are under the jurisdication of what is known as “Maritime Law”.  You will be subject to the law of the flag of that ship, enforceable by the “master of the ship,” otherwise known as the Captain, by the law of the flag.

If you enter a foreign embassy that happens to be in Washington DC, you are entering a distinct “enclave” with laws that may differ from your “home” state.  You will be subject to the laws of THAT country, not US law, just as if you are boarding a ship.  So, when you enter a courtroom displaying a gold or yellow fringed flag, be aware that you have just entered into a foreign country, and you better have your passport with you.  The judge sitting under a gold or yellow fringe flag becomes the “captain” or “master” of that ship or enclave and he has absolute power to make the rules as he goes.  The gold or yellow fringe flag is your WARNING that you are leaving your Constitutionally protected rights on the floor outside the door of that courtroom.

This is why so many judges are appointed, and not elected by the people.  Federal judges are appointed by the President, the national military commander in chief.  State judges are appointed by the Governors, the state military commanders (head of the State National Guard).  Judges are appointed because the courts are military courts and civilians do not “elect” military officers.

Gold-fringed flags only stand inside military courts that sit in summary court martial proceedings against civilians and such courts are governed in part by local rules, but more especially by “The Manual of Courts Martial”.  So, the next time you see this yellow fringed flag you will know what you are looking at and what it really means.  If you travel to Mexico and you see the National Flag of Mexico, you would know that you are under the jurisdiction of Mexico; and that Mexican laws govern you at that time.  That flag is your official notification when you see that flag.  You should understand that the gold fringed flag signifies the same thing.  It is a notification to you that you are under the rules and regulations of the military force that is flying that flag.

Government officials and judges often refuse requests to remove the gold fringed flag and replace it with the official flag of the United States as defined in the constitution – which has NO fringe.  In 1933 President Theodore Roosevelt described that the admiralty, maritime or administration display of the flag is established by the presence of “gold fringe, gold braid, gold eagle, gold spear, or gold ball atop the flag pole.”  In 1979 these standards were set down in Army regulations as part of the War Powers Act.  By submitting a plea to this type of court, you are silently assenting, or agreeing, that this court has jurisdiction over you.  That is how the display of the fringed-flags allows our freedoms to be taken away.  Be advised.

By: J. Mark Soveign


The STATE OF TEXAS vs John Q. PUBLIC [illegal possession of]

Special thanks to Seiko Seven for this information.

Note: Take a second to notice who the plaintiff is in the photo attached to this article … That photo has nothing to do with anything other than to show you what a criminal ‘complaint’ looks like where a prosecutor is bringing forth false claims against a ‘man’ by filing complaints in court that no living man can actually take the stand and verify. The ‘United States of America’ is not a living man.

If you feel this Notice could be of benefit to you, feel free to use it – or don’t. It has been successful at making five cases disappear in a puff of smoke, thus far. Simply trying to help my fellow Patriots in this brutal game of government interference of our Rights by sharing strategies that have been effective to this point when dealing with gov’t agencies/agents who insist on interfering with the Rights of man.

Edit: As of November 2, 2015 the Notice has been successful at making 6 cases vanish from Pacer without a trace – gone – poof – never happened.

Anytime a prosecuting attorney is bringing charges against you for anything pertaining to a code or statute violation such as those found in US Codes or State Statutes, he is operating under the presumption that you are one of that corporation’s own internal employees who is contractually obligated to abide by those internal statutes. It is a con, and they make billions of dollars every year off of unsuspecting Americans because we don’t know the difference between a criminal complaint and an actual claim.

I explain this in more detail here:
The 2nd Amendment Isn’t Under Attack, You Just Don’t Understand The Difference Between Statutes and Laws

If you are not employed by that corporation, such as the ‘IRS’, or the ‘CITY OF GALVESTON’, or the ‘STATE OF TEXAS’, or the ‘UNITED STATES’, and being compensated to abide by that corporation’s internal rules/codes/statutes/regulations, they simply do not apply to you, as Slavery and Involuntary Servitude are against the Law on American soil (see Amendment XIII), and no man may compel performance (force him to abide by internal corporate statutes) from another man, without fairly and justly compensating that man for his performance.

Gov’t employees have signed into an employment contract to hold those gov’t jobs, and they are being compensated to abide by that corporation’s internal statutes, but you and I are not, therefore, they simply do not apply to us.

Yes, it is a nationwide con that has been ongoing for years. It is how they control society under corporate statutes; it is how they interfere with your Rights; it is how they make billions of dollars due to our ignorance of the Law; it is how they incarcerate us for victimless crimes where there is no injured party.

Anytime a prosecutor brings forth a criminal complaint against you, it reads like this:

STATE OF TEXAS vs John Q. Public [illegal possession of cannabis oil, marijuana, automatic weapons, etc.]

If he had an actual claim, it would read like this:

Bob T. Jones II vs John Q. Public (Bob being the prosecutor himself in his capacity as a man).

He’s filing a complaint on behalf of some entity that goes by that name (STATE OF TEXAS), but he has no verifiable claim because nothing you may have done harmed HIM or his property, and he cannot produce his Plaintiff to point you out across the courtroom and say,

“That man sitting right over there caused me harm by his failure to file an income tax form, or his failure to obtain a concealed carry permit, or his possession of cannabis oil, etc.”

He’s only complaining, because gov’t cannot bring forth actual claims against man because man created gov’t. All they can do is complain if you are not an employee of that agency who is being compensated to abide by that agencies internal-corporate statutes. But his complaints are causing you harm; they are harming your good name within your community; they are depriving you of your property without due process of law, and they are wasting your very valuable time, money, and resources having to deal with a complaint that no one can take the stand and verify in open court.

Therefore, the prosecutor is filing false claims against his fellow man, and that is an unlawful act in which he most certainly can be held accountable.

To use this Notice in an existing case,

Just replace ‘STATE OF TEXAS’ with ‘IRS’ or ‘CITY OF GALVESTON’, or ‘CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES’, or ‘UNITED STATES’, etc. depending on your specific situation. If there is no property involved and it’s just some prosecutor attempting to bring you up on criminal complaint for something (anything), just take out the parts having to do with property.

Handwrite the Notice and make COPIES of the Notice. You’ll want to enter a COPY into the prosecutor’s case, not the original, as doing so would be surrendering your property to the court. You want to keep the original so they cannot alter it in any way shape or form. The only body that may hold and verify the original would be a Jury of your Peers. You have to be very vigilant in protecting your property (claims and notices) when dealing with these courts and prosecutors; if they can change or alter it in anyway to get themselves off the hook, bet your ass they will do just that. Protect yourself and only enter a COPY into their case so they know you still possess the original if they decide to trespass on your property by altering it in any way-shape or form.

Court Clerks are notorious for changing claims into complaints without your knowledge, so stay vigilant like emoticon

Remember: America is STILL a Common Law Nation (as is Canada, England, Australia, and a few others). Common Law is unwritten Law – It is nowhere to be found in codes/statutes/rules/regulations. Basically, you can do anything you damned well please as long as you are not harming your fellow man or his property, and you have the right to face your accuser (see Article VI) and settle with him on the private side before it goes public if for some reason you DO trespass on your fellow [wo]man.


If the prosecutor is stating the ‘IRS’, or the ‘STATE OF IDAHO’, etc. is the Plaintiff, then make the Son-of-a-Bitch put his Plaintiff on the witness stand so you may cross examine him and compensate him for any harm you may have caused him or his personal property by your failure to file paperwork, or failure to obtain a concealed carry permit, or failure to obtain a Class III weapons tax stamp, or possession of marijuana, etc. If he can’t produce the Plaintiff (the Plaintiff MUST Appear), then sue his ass for filing false claims against you and take his house or retirement fund. Someone (a living wo[man]) has to show up and verify the harm.

Here is the Notice:

” i: a man; require the STATE OF TEXAS to show up and verify his/her claim against me so i may cross examine my accuser (the plaintiff must appear) and compensate him/her for any harm i may have caused. If this man/woman that goes by the name ‘STATE OF TEXAS’ cannot show up to verify his/her claim, i require this matter immediately discharged. It is my belief there is no man/woman named ‘STATE OF TEXAS’ who can verify this claim by uttering with his/her voice I’ve done wrong or caused him/her personal harm, injury, or loss, therefore pressing it upon the record in open court. It is also my belief, that someone is filing complaints (false claims) on behalf of this entity known as the ‘STATE OF TEXAS’ in an attempt to unjustly enrich themselves and the ‘STATE OF TEXAS’ (whoever those individuals may be) and deprive me of my property without due process of law. If this matter is not immediately discharged, i will be requiring leave of court so i may bring a proper and verifiable claim before the court to address this trespass against me in the proper venue-a court of record (trespasses being: filing false claims, barratry, extortion, malicious prosecution, unjust enrichment, theft, robbery, etc.), in which i will be requiring compensation for the trespasses and wasting my valuable time, money, and resources having to deal with this complaint, as i do not have time to answer complaints without compensation at this time. If there is an actual verifiable claim before the court, i will be more than happy to show up free of charge and address any proper and verifiable claim against me. i also require and order the immediate restoration of my property (see Exhibit A) and one dollar per second from the commencement of the crime till my property is restored – your name here.’

Note: If there is no theft/robbery of property involved, just leave that out of the Notice. Property is anything you enjoy exclusive Right to. If it is a CPS case involving children, you use the word property, not ‘children’. The STATE has no control over property, but they do have control over words they use in their statutes such as ‘child’, ‘infant’, ‘children’, ‘motor vehicle’, ‘marijuana’, ‘automatic weapons’, ‘firearms’, ‘land’, ‘homes’, ‘bicycles’, etc. You always want to use that word ‘property’, period! And ‘Exhibit A’ should be a photo of the property attached to the back of your Notice; a photocopy of that property is fine.

Either someone can show up and VERIFY the claim by pressing it upon the record in open court, or there is no case, period. The prosecutor cannot verify the claim because he has no first hand knowledge, and nothing you may have done caused harm, injury, or loss to himself or his property.

Simply put, he’s filing false claims to unjustly enrich himself, and this entity known as the ‘STATE OF TEXAS’, or ‘IRS’, or ‘UNITED STATES’, etc. You’re letting the man/woman who’s prosecuting this case against you know, that if they don’t discharge this nonsense before the next hearing, you are going to stop the next hearing in its tracks by saying “i require leave of court so I may bring a proper and verifiable claim against YOU for filing false claims against me, and I will be requiring compensation for the trespasses.

Your claim supercedes his silly complaint. You can verify your claim, but he cannot verify the complaint, as he himself has no first hand knowledge, and nothing you may have done caused harm, injury, or loss to himself or his property, and he cannot produce his Plaintiff because there is no man named ‘STATE OF TEXAS’ who can take the stand and verify the complaint, either.

Court is a place for man to settle claims, not complaints.

You’ll want to enter that Notice into an existing case they have against you. If the prosecutor doesn’t discharge/dismiss the case after reading that Notice, he’s calling your bluff. When you get to the hearing, simply keep your mouth shut and keep referring the judge back to your Notice anytime he’s asks you questions because he’s more than likely trying to pull you out of the Common Law and back into their jurisdiction (control).

If they insist on continuing or ignoring you, then do what you said you would do in the Notice and REQUIRE (to demand by right and by authority) leave of court for a few days so you can perfect your actual claim against the prosecutor and drag his ass into court as a defendant for filing false claims against you. Because the compensation you will be requiring for the trespass shall exceed twenty dollars, you’ll be able to drag him into a trial by jury (see Article VII) as a defendant for filing false claims against you that no Plaintiff showed up to verify.

If a prosecutor is claiming the ‘UNITED STATES’ is the Plaintiff in his suit against you, then for the love of God make him produce his Plaintiff so you may cross examine your accuser. Article VI guarantees you that right (that Right predates the Constitution). He can’t produce the Plaintiff, because the ‘UNITED STATES’ is not a living man who can utter with his voice you’ve done wrong and caused him personal harm, injury, or loss ….. and this is how you call them out on it and hold them personally accountable for filing false claims against you.

In order for their to be a controversy for a judge to hear, there MUST be a living man or woman willing to take the stand and VERIFY harm, injury, or loss you may have caused. If no living man or woman can take the stand, then there is NO CONTROVERSY, and what the hell are you doing there?

If there is no [wo]man willing to take the stand and VERIFY that YOU have caused them or their property, harm, injury, or loss, then there is no controversy; if there is no controversy, there is no jurisdiction of ANY court; or ANY judge to ever entertain the case, because there is no case.

A corporation such as the UNITED STATES or the STATE OF TEXAS cannot take the stand, it is a fictitious-corporate entity created by man. It does not speak; it does not eat; it does not drink; it cannot bring forth a claim against a living man, period.

Here’s Karl Lentz explaining the concept of filing a claim against their complaint in the comment section below. Listen to the entire 4 minutes, you’ll be glad you did.

And if you’d like to learn REAL and actual LAW of this Land and how to defend yourself against gov’t agents, this would be a good place to start:

And if the ‘gov’t’ were to pay off/coerce some other citizen claiming you’ve done that person harm (to trap you and get a conviction) then that person has to verify the complaint; verify the harm, injury, or loss, by showing up to court; taking the stand under Oath or Affirmation and present you a bill of particulars for their medical bills; prescriptions; loss of work; mental stress (psychologist bill), etc. so you may have the opportunity to compensate them for your trespasses, if indeed they can VERIFY anything they ‘say’ you actually did caused them or their personal property harm, injury, or loss wink emoticon

I’ve heard of prosecutors paying off little old ladies; offer to pay off their IRS bills, or property taxes, etc. to testify against a man to convince a jury you’re a REAL BAD MAN that needs to be locked away because you punched her; raped her, or some other bullshit claim, and threaten her if she doesn’t that she’ll lose her house and little dog ‘jo-jo’. These crooks are ruthless, don’t let them pin you down without someone taking the stand to actually VERIFY the harm, injury, or loss.

Remember: A Court of Record ONLY proceeds under Common Law. If not you are an ‘Idiot’ with regards to their legalese-statutory horseshit, and you are ONLY there to settle any VERIFIABLE claim another man has brought forth against you. If there is no man (an actual plaintiff) who can take the stand to verify harm, injury, or loss, then there is no controversy; if there is no controversy, there is no jurisdiction of any court to even entertain the case wink emoticon

Here you will here Gus evoking Common Law in his Felony Possession of Firearm Hearing. He keeps repeating “I’m here to settle any claim’, and finally the Judged decides to take a recess because he knows there is no plaintiff, and he knows Gus is putting him in somewhat of a pinch by invoking Common Law, and he has no answer other than to take a recess.