Are you SICK of PAYING the Government to TRAVEL?

U.S. COURT DECISIONS CONFIRM “DRIVING A MOTOR VEHICLE” IS A
CITIZENS RIGHT AND NOT A GOVERNMENT GRANTED PRIVILEGE.
By Jack McLamb (from Aid & Abet Newsletter)

For many years Professionals within the criminal justice System have acted upon the belief that traveling by motor vehicle upon the roadway was a privilege that was gained by a citizen only after approval by their respective state government in the form of the issuance of a permit or license to that Particular individual. Legislators, police officers and court officials are becoming aware that there are now court decisions that prove the fallacy of the legal opinion that” driving is a privilege and therefore requires government approval, i.e. a license”.

Some of these cases are:

Case # 1 – “Even the legislature has no power to deny to a citizen the right to travel upon the highway and transport his property in the ordinary course of his business or pleasure, though this right may be regulated in accordance with the public interest and convenience. – Chicago Motor Coach v Chicago 169 NE 22

(“Regulated” here means traffic safety enforcement, stop lights, signs, etc. NOT a privilege that requires permission i.e.- licensing, mandatory insurance, vehicle registration, etc.)

Case # 2 – “The right of the citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, either by carriage or by automobile, is not a mere privilege which a city may prohibit or permit at will, but a common right which he has under the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.”- Thompson v Smith 154 SE 579.

It could not be stated more conclusively that Citizens of the states have a right to travel, without approval or restriction (license), and that this right is protected under the U.S. Constitution. Here are other court decisions that expound the same facts:

Case # 3 – “The right to travel is a part of the liberty of which the citizen cannot be deprived without due process of law under the 5th Amendment.” –Kent v Dulles, 357 U.S. 116, 125.

Case # 4 – “Undoubtedly the right of locomotion, the right to remove from one place to another according to inclination, is an attribute of personal liberty, and the right, ordinarily, of free transit from or through the territory of any State is a right secured by the l4th Amendment and by other provisions of the Constitution.” – Schactman v Dulles, 96 App D.C. 287, 293. Continue reading “Are you SICK of PAYING the Government to TRAVEL?”

NOTICE OF REVOCATION OF ANY PRESUMED AUTHORITY

Special thanks go out to Donald Wayne for showing me this.

Here we go then, http://thelawdictionary.org/city/, start with this definition. A city is a municipal corporation, therefore the Police are Policy Enforcement and NOT Law Enforcement. Now some will say that the legislative statutes are Law, they are NOT and ONLY apply to the citizens who elect to be treated as citizens/Citizens or Civilians. NOW, filing the Assumed Name Certificate REMOVES this presumption. So once you file the Assumed Name and take care of that, you have the Lawful Authority to Sue anyone in any court of Law. So you Sue these people, Cops/Prosecutors/Judges and Clerks in their private capacity. You send them a “Notice of Intent to Sue” and give them 10 days to respond. If they do not rebut your claim and provide proof of Jurisdiction then you file a default and then a criminal action in U.S. District court in your city. They will either dismiss the charges and drop everything or ignore you which is the same thing, Dismissed with prejudice. Read, copy and paste if you can this; Letter to Court or Public Servants

You are hereby NOTICED that I am a living soul standing ONLY under God, my Creator, protected by the legal jurisdiction of the PNLSB of North America, and thereby FREE to work in any common occupation of my choice without taxation and regulation by any Defacto State of the UNITED STATES. By making this response to you with this letter, I am NOTICING to you that I AM NOT conveying any authority of jurisdiction whatsoever to you or this Court. All sovereign Rights are perpetually reserved now and forever.

You are hereby NOTICED that I am not A Corporation, nor am I a U.S. citizen, nor a government created fiction, nor have I ever granted Power of Attorney over myself to the defacto State of the several states of the UNITED STATES or to any Court or its Judges to treat me as if I am a subject citizen, nor do I intend ever to do so in the future. I have NO CONTRACT obligation with the defacto State of any union STATE and NO CONTRACT with any Court or any Judge attempting to fraudulently impose obligations on me to the defacto State of this or any STATE, nor do I ever intend to have any such contracts, as such contracts would violate Sovereign Pembina Nation status and my contracts with my Creator from whom I received my UNALIENABLE Rights in the first place.

FOR AND ON THE RECORD, I hereby revoke, rescind, and void ab initio any and all supposed, alleged, assumed, or presumed signatures, autographs or marks of mine, that you or anyone might have on any non-disclosed contract in your possession without a lawful offer, acceptance, consideration or value provided by both parties, and without a meeting of the minds and full disclosure as to the nature of the contract. I hereby affirm that I would never knowingly, willingly, and voluntarily sign any contract with any State of the union of the UNITED STATES that would steal away my natural God-given Rights and replace those Rights with privileges granted by the State(s) for the purpose of their taxing me for my right to travel or work in a common occupation.

Points in fact:

1. You or your public servant has stopped a Sovereign Nation living member Man/Woman with first right claims upon the land he/she travels upon.
2. This living Man/Woman exists in a completely separate and lawfully distinct jurisdiction recognized by treaty with the UNITED STATES.
3. There are no crossings of the boundaries of jurisdiction where you can apply any laws of the civil and statutory codes of incorporation to the living Man/Woman.
4. State vehicle codes do not apply to the living Man/Woman because of the boundaries of jurisdiction between the incorporated states and the living as well as the recognition of treaty with the United States that cannot be lawfully crossed from the incorporated STATES over to the real world of the living Man/Woman within the jurisdiction of the Sovereign Nation, who travels as a matter of unalienable right within the kingdom of the one creator upon the land, water or air of the earth.
5. You as a Public Servant of any incorporated state operating under defacto color of law jurisdiction cannot cross the boundaries of jurisdiction from your world into the real world of the living Man/Woman because of the nature of a fiction that exists in name or on paper only I. E. Public Servant. The office of Public Servant you hold is a fictional office that is animated by the living Man/Woman who accepts the title of the office he/she holds. The laws of this office cannot be applied to the living Man/Woman, but only to another holding the fictional office of “person” or one who has accepted a privilege from a STATE in the form of a contract I. E. a State issued driver’s license.
6. In order for you to stop Me, you must first have a contract to do so. You have not produced a signed contract between You and Me.
7. For the living Man/Woman to be liable to the codes of the Corporation the living Man/Woman must be so named in the code(s) that you are attempting to apply to the living Man/Woman.
8. No contracts exist between your state and Me the living Man/Woman so there is no assumption of jurisdiction that you can rely upon to assume you have the authority to assume any jurisdiction and you have no authority to demand the living Man/Woman to enter into a contract with you or your STATE. I. E. Traffic Ticket/Citation. States operate in Contract Laws thus a citation is an offer of contract.
9. You will note that there is no STATE issued license plates on the living Man/Woman private property vehicle, which translates to no jurisdiction over the property by the Public Servant or the STATE. My Sovereign tag is Both my Flag and my Tag, and My Flag supersedes your flag by virtue of the Treaty of 1778 and the “Old Crossing Treaty of 1863” first right to the land.
10. As a living Man/Woman, retaining all God given sovereignty, I have not given permission, consent or authority to the Corporation of the STATE, therefore the STATE has no case.

Authority of the Public Servants and Courts.
Blacks Law Dictionary
The word AUTHORITY MEANS:
1. Right
OR
2. Permission

In order for a court to have the right to jurisdiction over a Man or Woman that court must operate in Common Law, which means that under Common Law all Rights are for and in the favor of the Man/Woman and not the Court.

In order for the Court to operate in statutory or Civil Codes or what is mistakenly known as laws against a Man/Woman, they must have permission from the Man/Woman to do so. The Courts operate in commerce, which is the code of contracts, not laws. Laws are reserved for Common Law.

(Revocable authority authors NOTE:)
In general, an authority is revocable, unless it is given as a security, or it be coupled with an interest. The revocation is either express or implied; when it is express and made known to the person authorized, the authority is at an end; the revocation is implied when the principal dies, or, if a Female, marries; or the subject of the authority is destroyed, as if a Man have/has authority to sell my house, and it is destroyed by fire or to buy for me a horse, and before the execution of the authority, the horse dies.

When once the agent has exercised all the authority given to him, the authority is at an end.

An authority is to be so construed as to include all necessary or usual means of executing it with effect and when the agent acts, avowedly as such, within his authority, he is not personally responsible.

Have you committed fraud without knowing it?

Ok, the folks over at “Lose the Name” are going to enjoy this one…

Would you ever take and use something that is not yours? Have you ever heard of a “honeypot”? A honeypot is a device employed in web security that traps and detects hackers. IT IS A TRAP!

Below is a screenshot from a document located at http://www.opsi.gov.uk/advice/crown-copyright/crown-copyright-in-the-information-age.pdf and the first thing that jumped out at me was information about how the crown copyright affects things even in the UNITED STATES, which leads me to conclude that we have already been overthrown by the British and have been slaves to this “Crown corporation” for much longer than any of us would be comfortable thinking about. Then on page 29 was the evidence sitting there in black and white (the red was added by me). See for yourself:

CROWN COPYRIGHT IN THE INFORMATION AGE (1998) SCREENSHOT
CROWN COPYRIGHT IN THE INFORMATION AGE (1998) SCREENSHOT

Thou shall not steal. Thou shall not covet. Thou shall not bear false witness. I can name at least 3 commandments that are broken when you attempt to get a copy of your birth certificate. You are attempting to steal something that you do not own (a legal entity). You are also coveting the “privileges” that come with such legal entity. You are also bearing false witness by claiming to be a security, a piece of paper, a bond slave. Please stop doing this. Continue reading “Have you committed fraud without knowing it?”