Be Careful Who You Listen to and Trust

Please be careful who you listen to, who you trust. Even be careful with what I say, use your own intuition. After all we are blessed with intuition and the ability to differentiate right from wrong. I would even expect you to question me and what I say, even though I know I would never intentionally lie to you.

The reason why I bring this topic up, is because there are infiltrators and provocateurs out there that are casting huge nets with which to build lists of names of individuals to be used later when larger scale “round ups” of liberty minded patriots begins.

The ones that are the ones that you should suspect first are those who close channels of communication rather that keep them open by responding and communicating with fair, open, and responsive communications. Those who do not respond or respond with slander, orders, negativity, or even just remaining silent are all signs that they may not be someone that you can trust. After all, these agencies and officers of government are only supposed to be there to serve and protect the rights and property of the people. There is no other reason for government, except perhaps defense of the homeland.

These agent provocateurs will also try to keep you in a narrow viewpoint about the situation, and not only will they express a narrow viewpoint, they will usually always try to influence you in a particular way. Sometimes they will try and convince you to not trust a particular individual, sometimes they will exhaustively promote particular individuals or groups.

These plants and government shills also commonly won’t give you a straight answer when you ask them a simple question, and their favorite response is to imply that there is a defect with the complainant to sidestep the actual complaint.

When I talk about those who should be suspected and placed under further scrutiny and background review, I am not just talking about individuals, there may also be shill groups, or organizations. And the ones that should be scrutinized the MOST are those who claim to either be actively affiliated with or employed by government, or those actively promoting ideologies claiming that the government is fair, just, honest, or unbiased.

13133243_244191322636622_309713294813844185_nNaturally those working for the government or benefiting from the government in some way are highly suspect, because they stand to lose the most by withdrawing or losing their support for the broken corrupt system. They are dependent on the government, why challenge it? They will also contradict themselves; for example they may express sympathy and support for the protesters, but at the same time will express support for the government and the “court system” in particular. Like the fox guarding the hen house, they will usually be slick talkers as well. But will rarely offer citations or evidence to prove their claims.

While we are on this subject, I would like to talk briefly about lawyers. And I have more information here if you are interested in learning more. But who has more to lose from the government than a lawyer? Not just any lawyer, but a lawyer that makes his living by arguing cases in government courthouses?

Don’t you think that the government would want to make sure that there were “attorneys” to defend the protesters? Keep them in the casino, where their chances are not good. And by not just any attorneys, but maybe even an attorney from the “Top 100” list of all trial attorneys to prepare their defense. One who has worked their whole career arguing in support of subjects of government who were mainly charged with “code” or “statute” violations. A vast majority of them without a victim, like DUII cases, and other trumped up “code” violations.

I don’t know about you, but after doing years of research on this topic. I have never found in the founding documents where the founders of this country ever suggested or implied that the people were bound by any “code”, “statute”, “rules”, “regulations” or “policy” of government. As a matter of fact the Declaration of Independence says exactly this: “…all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,…” Continue reading “Be Careful Who You Listen to and Trust”

The feds IN FACT have no jurisdiction to prosecute Bundys

The 1861 Civil-War era law (H. R. 45) isn’t applicable to prosecute the Bundys and the other protesters. The feds IN FACT have no jurisdiction.

Are you a one man militia buying bullets…prepping to protect your home and family? That won’t do against the FBI and DHS. You and your family won’t survive unless WE RISE UP TOGETHER NOW, not on tyranny’s agenda. Do you really believe that another election is going to change the minds of all the enemies arrayed against us? There really is no better time and place to begin Constitutional restoration than to insist the feds release the peaceful protesters, including Cliven Bundy, they have jailed in Portland, Oregon. They all had good reason to feel wrongfully (unlawfully) threatened by the feds and were in fact within their rights to be armed and at the Malheur Refuge while protesting and teaching our Constitution to the citizens in Oregon.

The use of the 1861 Civil-War era law by Greg Bretzing, other FBI agents and their “partners,” most notably the nastiest whore in Oregon, Kate Brown, in their conspiracy to ambush and murder LaVoy Finicum and falsely arrest the other peaceful protesters IS IN FACT BASED ENTIRELY on the premise (false claim) that the peaceful protesters had been “occupying a federal building on federal land, (i.e., what the federal government and their “partners” call the “Malheur National Wildlife Refuge”), and as falsely charged with threats of violence were preventing federal officers from performing their duties.”

Bretzing

FBI “Special agent” Greg Bretzing unlawfully took charge of “law enforcement” in Harney County, Oregon. He either knew he was unlawfully following illegitimate orders, or did not take the time to read our Constitution, i.e., acted irresponsibly.

The ambush and premeditated murder of LaVoy Finicum, and false arrests of numerous other protesters, all now charged with “conspiracy,” is the federal government’s claim that there is a “conspiracy” against the federal government (not against the United States, but against the federal government). Apparently, the feds have decided that their best attempt at prosecution is to accuse the protesters of “conspiracy,” because it is easier to prosecute than an actual crime (where there is no victim, there is no crime) and their claim of “conspiracy” is a classic example of evil claiming to be good and accusing good of being evil.

“Woe to those who call evil good and good evil…” Isaiah 5:20

NOTE: The protesters are accused of “arming up and threatening federal officers with violence to prevent them from performing their duties.” But in fact the “duties” that the feds claim DO NOT EXIST and LaVoy Finicum and other peaceful protesters threatened and injured no one. The feds are in fact claiming to be a victim, but the “duties” they claim are wholly illegitimate. The feds were NOT victims, NOR were any of the citizens of Harney County.

“Our rulers can have no authority over natural rights, only as we have submitted to them. The rights of conscience we never submitted. We are answerable for them to our God. Thelegitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as injurious to others. ” Thomas Jefferson

The facts clearly reveal that, with their premeditated murder of LaVoy Finicum, false arrests and false charges against the other protesters (all victims of a crime) that the feds are attempting to conceal their unlawfully taking (theft) of state lands, i.e., that the feds and their “partners” are in fact the ones who have been conspiring, and with their overt assembling and unlawful use of an army (their private army) are in fact LEVYING WAR against the United States, i.e., in fact COMMITTING TREASON against the United States.

HR 45The 1861 bill (H. R. 45) was signed into law by Abraham Lincoln to arrest what were labelled as “secessionists” who had taken the federal government’s forts, naval bases, post offices, and federal court buildings.

First of all, the “secessionists” in 1861 had not taken a “wildlife refuge.” They had only taken buildings that the federal government had erected in accordance with Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 of the United States Constitution. Nowhere in Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 does it say the federal government is to own or manage lands or to erect buildings on a “wildlife refuge.”

ten Miles square (2)In fact Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 does not even include the word “land” in it: The very name “Bureau of Land Management” (“BLM”) is IN FACT an act of fraud. As Justice Antonin Scalia stated:

“The Constitution is a legal document, and it says what it says and doesn’t say what it doesn’t say.

Was Justice Scalia murdered…to hide the murder of Lavoy Finicum? Was Justice Scalia going to speak out regarding the feds’ theft of lands?

Second, LaVoy Finicum, the Bundys and all the other protesters in Oregon do not oppose federal power. What they do oppose (and did so peacefully) is the abuse of power by the federal government, including the federal government’s unlawful taking of millions of acres of state lands, including the building that the federal government erected on the “national wildlife refuge”—having nothing to do with the legislative authority granted the federal government in Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 of the United States Constitution.

Third, the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge was taken by Teddy Roosevelt byExecutive Order No. 929, NOT “purchased” as required by Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 of our Constitution. In other words the federal government has no jurisdiction in the lands the protesters have been are accused of “occupying”. The FBI and its “partners” had no authority to ambush LaVoy Finicum and other protesters — the federal courts have no jurisdiction, NONE WHATSOEVER. In regards to the feds lack of jurisdiction also see US v. Cornell.

The federal prosecutors claim that the protesters had no right to oppose federal enforcement officers whether or not they believed that the federal government has no constitutional jurisdiction over the lands. Such a claim is LUDICROUS in light of the fact that all administrative and “legal remedies” have been entirely exhausted. The federal courts (federal judges) have revealed they are politically motivated and have no intention of following the rule of law—willfully violating and alienating the United States Constitution… and even worse they refuse to acknowledge our Natural Rights to self-defense. It is with their refusal to acknowledge our Natural Rights that they have accused the protesters of being violent simply because they were armed. And yet, not once did LaVoy Finicum nor the other protesters, ever point a gun at anyone. Quite the opposite, they were in fact peacefully and patiently teaching our Constitution to the citizens of Harney County and had been invited to also do so in Grant County when the FBI and its “partners” suddenly decided to be violent, in fact forced LaVoy Finicum and his fellow protesters into what is known as  a “killing field”.

NOTE: The 2nd Amendment of our Constitution supports our Natural Rights to self-defense and the feds and their “partners” have in fact falsely accused law abiding  Americans who felt threatened of “arming up”.

The fact is that the protesters were protesting against individuals in the federal government and their “partners” who have been conspiring, not only against the United States, but against the federal government, i.e., against the constraints on the federal government established for us by our Founding Fathers. Any federal officer, official, judge, agent, or employee, or officer, official, judge, agent, or employee in any of the 50 states who does not speak in the first place in support and defense of our Constitution and subsequently in support and defense of LaVoy Finicum and the protesters now imprisoned, is today committing treason against the United States and MUST BE REMOVED FROM OUR OFFICES !!!!! They do not have a “duties” to violate and alienate our Constitution !!!!!

If the federal court in Portland Oregon (for lack of jurisdiction) does not release all the Bundys and the other protesters who have exposed the feds’ unlawful taking (theft) of the Malheur “Wildlife Refuge” in Harney County, Oregon and the millions of other acres of land belonging to various states, and arrest warrants are not issued for Greg Bretzing, other FBI agents and their “partners,” for the ambush and murder of LaVoy Finicum, and false arrests of the other protesters, (i.e., acts of treason), I will begin returning fire. I cannot sit quietly when war is being levied against the United States !

———————-

Source

Continue reading “The feds IN FACT have no jurisdiction to prosecute Bundys”