The STATE OF TEXAS vs John Q. PUBLIC [illegal possession of]

Special thanks to Seiko Seven for this information.

Note: Take a second to notice who the plaintiff is in the photo attached to this article … That photo has nothing to do with anything other than to show you what a criminal ‘complaint’ looks like where a prosecutor is bringing forth false claims against a ‘man’ by filing complaints in court that no living man can actually take the stand and verify. The ‘United States of America’ is not a living man.

If you feel this Notice could be of benefit to you, feel free to use it – or don’t. It has been successful at making five cases disappear in a puff of smoke, thus far. Simply trying to help my fellow Patriots in this brutal game of government interference of our Rights by sharing strategies that have been effective to this point when dealing with gov’t agencies/agents who insist on interfering with the Rights of man.

Edit: As of November 2, 2015 the Notice has been successful at making 6 cases vanish from Pacer without a trace – gone – poof – never happened.

Anytime a prosecuting attorney is bringing charges against you for anything pertaining to a code or statute violation such as those found in US Codes or State Statutes, he is operating under the presumption that you are one of that corporation’s own internal employees who is contractually obligated to abide by those internal statutes. It is a con, and they make billions of dollars every year off of unsuspecting Americans because we don’t know the difference between a criminal complaint and an actual claim.

I explain this in more detail here:
The 2nd Amendment Isn’t Under Attack, You Just Don’t Understand The Difference Between Statutes and Laws

If you are not employed by that corporation, such as the ‘IRS’, or the ‘CITY OF GALVESTON’, or the ‘STATE OF TEXAS’, or the ‘UNITED STATES’, and being compensated to abide by that corporation’s internal rules/codes/statutes/regulations, they simply do not apply to you, as Slavery and Involuntary Servitude are against the Law on American soil (see Amendment XIII), and no man may compel performance (force him to abide by internal corporate statutes) from another man, without fairly and justly compensating that man for his performance.

Gov’t employees have signed into an employment contract to hold those gov’t jobs, and they are being compensated to abide by that corporation’s internal statutes, but you and I are not, therefore, they simply do not apply to us.

Yes, it is a nationwide con that has been ongoing for years. It is how they control society under corporate statutes; it is how they interfere with your Rights; it is how they make billions of dollars due to our ignorance of the Law; it is how they incarcerate us for victimless crimes where there is no injured party.

Anytime a prosecutor brings forth a criminal complaint against you, it reads like this:

STATE OF TEXAS vs John Q. Public [illegal possession of cannabis oil, marijuana, automatic weapons, etc.]

If he had an actual claim, it would read like this:

Bob T. Jones II vs John Q. Public (Bob being the prosecutor himself in his capacity as a man).

He’s filing a complaint on behalf of some entity that goes by that name (STATE OF TEXAS), but he has no verifiable claim because nothing you may have done harmed HIM or his property, and he cannot produce his Plaintiff to point you out across the courtroom and say,

“That man sitting right over there caused me harm by his failure to file an income tax form, or his failure to obtain a concealed carry permit, or his possession of cannabis oil, etc.”

He’s only complaining, because gov’t cannot bring forth actual claims against man because man created gov’t. All they can do is complain if you are not an employee of that agency who is being compensated to abide by that agencies internal-corporate statutes. But his complaints are causing you harm; they are harming your good name within your community; they are depriving you of your property without due process of law, and they are wasting your very valuable time, money, and resources having to deal with a complaint that no one can take the stand and verify in open court.

Therefore, the prosecutor is filing false claims against his fellow man, and that is an unlawful act in which he most certainly can be held accountable.

To use this Notice in an existing case,

Just replace ‘STATE OF TEXAS’ with ‘IRS’ or ‘CITY OF GALVESTON’, or ‘CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES’, or ‘UNITED STATES’, etc. depending on your specific situation. If there is no property involved and it’s just some prosecutor attempting to bring you up on criminal complaint for something (anything), just take out the parts having to do with property.

Handwrite the Notice and make COPIES of the Notice. You’ll want to enter a COPY into the prosecutor’s case, not the original, as doing so would be surrendering your property to the court. You want to keep the original so they cannot alter it in any way shape or form. The only body that may hold and verify the original would be a Jury of your Peers. You have to be very vigilant in protecting your property (claims and notices) when dealing with these courts and prosecutors; if they can change or alter it in anyway to get themselves off the hook, bet your ass they will do just that. Protect yourself and only enter a COPY into their case so they know you still possess the original if they decide to trespass on your property by altering it in any way-shape or form.

Court Clerks are notorious for changing claims into complaints without your knowledge, so stay vigilant like emoticon

Remember: America is STILL a Common Law Nation (as is Canada, England, Australia, and a few others). Common Law is unwritten Law – It is nowhere to be found in codes/statutes/rules/regulations. Basically, you can do anything you damned well please as long as you are not harming your fellow man or his property, and you have the right to face your accuser (see Article VI) and settle with him on the private side before it goes public if for some reason you DO trespass on your fellow [wo]man.


If the prosecutor is stating the ‘IRS’, or the ‘STATE OF IDAHO’, etc. is the Plaintiff, then make the Son-of-a-Bitch put his Plaintiff on the witness stand so you may cross examine him and compensate him for any harm you may have caused him or his personal property by your failure to file paperwork, or failure to obtain a concealed carry permit, or failure to obtain a Class III weapons tax stamp, or possession of marijuana, etc. If he can’t produce the Plaintiff (the Plaintiff MUST Appear), then sue his ass for filing false claims against you and take his house or retirement fund. Someone (a living wo[man]) has to show up and verify the harm.

Here is the Notice:

” i: a man; require the STATE OF TEXAS to show up and verify his/her claim against me so i may cross examine my accuser (the plaintiff must appear) and compensate him/her for any harm i may have caused. If this man/woman that goes by the name ‘STATE OF TEXAS’ cannot show up to verify his/her claim, i require this matter immediately discharged. It is my belief there is no man/woman named ‘STATE OF TEXAS’ who can verify this claim by uttering with his/her voice I’ve done wrong or caused him/her personal harm, injury, or loss, therefore pressing it upon the record in open court. It is also my belief, that someone is filing complaints (false claims) on behalf of this entity known as the ‘STATE OF TEXAS’ in an attempt to unjustly enrich themselves and the ‘STATE OF TEXAS’ (whoever those individuals may be) and deprive me of my property without due process of law. If this matter is not immediately discharged, i will be requiring leave of court so i may bring a proper and verifiable claim before the court to address this trespass against me in the proper venue-a court of record (trespasses being: filing false claims, barratry, extortion, malicious prosecution, unjust enrichment, theft, robbery, etc.), in which i will be requiring compensation for the trespasses and wasting my valuable time, money, and resources having to deal with this complaint, as i do not have time to answer complaints without compensation at this time. If there is an actual verifiable claim before the court, i will be more than happy to show up free of charge and address any proper and verifiable claim against me. i also require and order the immediate restoration of my property (see Exhibit A) and one dollar per second from the commencement of the crime till my property is restored – your name here.’

Note: If there is no theft/robbery of property involved, just leave that out of the Notice. Property is anything you enjoy exclusive Right to. If it is a CPS case involving children, you use the word property, not ‘children’. The STATE has no control over property, but they do have control over words they use in their statutes such as ‘child’, ‘infant’, ‘children’, ‘motor vehicle’, ‘marijuana’, ‘automatic weapons’, ‘firearms’, ‘land’, ‘homes’, ‘bicycles’, etc. You always want to use that word ‘property’, period! And ‘Exhibit A’ should be a photo of the property attached to the back of your Notice; a photocopy of that property is fine.

Either someone can show up and VERIFY the claim by pressing it upon the record in open court, or there is no case, period. The prosecutor cannot verify the claim because he has no first hand knowledge, and nothing you may have done caused harm, injury, or loss to himself or his property.

Simply put, he’s filing false claims to unjustly enrich himself, and this entity known as the ‘STATE OF TEXAS’, or ‘IRS’, or ‘UNITED STATES’, etc. You’re letting the man/woman who’s prosecuting this case against you know, that if they don’t discharge this nonsense before the next hearing, you are going to stop the next hearing in its tracks by saying “i require leave of court so I may bring a proper and verifiable claim against YOU for filing false claims against me, and I will be requiring compensation for the trespasses.

Your claim supercedes his silly complaint. You can verify your claim, but he cannot verify the complaint, as he himself has no first hand knowledge, and nothing you may have done caused harm, injury, or loss to himself or his property, and he cannot produce his Plaintiff because there is no man named ‘STATE OF TEXAS’ who can take the stand and verify the complaint, either.

Court is a place for man to settle claims, not complaints.

You’ll want to enter that Notice into an existing case they have against you. If the prosecutor doesn’t discharge/dismiss the case after reading that Notice, he’s calling your bluff. When you get to the hearing, simply keep your mouth shut and keep referring the judge back to your Notice anytime he’s asks you questions because he’s more than likely trying to pull you out of the Common Law and back into their jurisdiction (control).

If they insist on continuing or ignoring you, then do what you said you would do in the Notice and REQUIRE (to demand by right and by authority) leave of court for a few days so you can perfect your actual claim against the prosecutor and drag his ass into court as a defendant for filing false claims against you. Because the compensation you will be requiring for the trespass shall exceed twenty dollars, you’ll be able to drag him into a trial by jury (see Article VII) as a defendant for filing false claims against you that no Plaintiff showed up to verify.

If a prosecutor is claiming the ‘UNITED STATES’ is the Plaintiff in his suit against you, then for the love of God make him produce his Plaintiff so you may cross examine your accuser. Article VI guarantees you that right (that Right predates the Constitution). He can’t produce the Plaintiff, because the ‘UNITED STATES’ is not a living man who can utter with his voice you’ve done wrong and caused him personal harm, injury, or loss ….. and this is how you call them out on it and hold them personally accountable for filing false claims against you.

In order for their to be a controversy for a judge to hear, there MUST be a living man or woman willing to take the stand and VERIFY harm, injury, or loss you may have caused. If no living man or woman can take the stand, then there is NO CONTROVERSY, and what the hell are you doing there?

If there is no [wo]man willing to take the stand and VERIFY that YOU have caused them or their property, harm, injury, or loss, then there is no controversy; if there is no controversy, there is no jurisdiction of ANY court; or ANY judge to ever entertain the case, because there is no case.

A corporation such as the UNITED STATES or the STATE OF TEXAS cannot take the stand, it is a fictitious-corporate entity created by man. It does not speak; it does not eat; it does not drink; it cannot bring forth a claim against a living man, period.

Here’s Karl Lentz explaining the concept of filing a claim against their complaint in the comment section below. Listen to the entire 4 minutes, you’ll be glad you did.

And if you’d like to learn REAL and actual LAW of this Land and how to defend yourself against gov’t agents, this would be a good place to start:

And if the ‘gov’t’ were to pay off/coerce some other citizen claiming you’ve done that person harm (to trap you and get a conviction) then that person has to verify the complaint; verify the harm, injury, or loss, by showing up to court; taking the stand under Oath or Affirmation and present you a bill of particulars for their medical bills; prescriptions; loss of work; mental stress (psychologist bill), etc. so you may have the opportunity to compensate them for your trespasses, if indeed they can VERIFY anything they ‘say’ you actually did caused them or their personal property harm, injury, or loss wink emoticon

I’ve heard of prosecutors paying off little old ladies; offer to pay off their IRS bills, or property taxes, etc. to testify against a man to convince a jury you’re a REAL BAD MAN that needs to be locked away because you punched her; raped her, or some other bullshit claim, and threaten her if she doesn’t that she’ll lose her house and little dog ‘jo-jo’. These crooks are ruthless, don’t let them pin you down without someone taking the stand to actually VERIFY the harm, injury, or loss.

Remember: A Court of Record ONLY proceeds under Common Law. If not you are an ‘Idiot’ with regards to their legalese-statutory horseshit, and you are ONLY there to settle any VERIFIABLE claim another man has brought forth against you. If there is no man (an actual plaintiff) who can take the stand to verify harm, injury, or loss, then there is no controversy; if there is no controversy, there is no jurisdiction of any court to even entertain the case wink emoticon

Here you will here Gus evoking Common Law in his Felony Possession of Firearm Hearing. He keeps repeating “I’m here to settle any claim’, and finally the Judged decides to take a recess because he knows there is no plaintiff, and he knows Gus is putting him in somewhat of a pinch by invoking Common Law, and he has no answer other than to take a recess.


Special thanks go out to Donald Wayne for showing me this.

Here we go then,, start with this definition. A city is a municipal corporation, therefore the Police are Policy Enforcement and NOT Law Enforcement. Now some will say that the legislative statutes are Law, they are NOT and ONLY apply to the citizens who elect to be treated as citizens/Citizens or Civilians. NOW, filing the Assumed Name Certificate REMOVES this presumption. So once you file the Assumed Name and take care of that, you have the Lawful Authority to Sue anyone in any court of Law. So you Sue these people, Cops/Prosecutors/Judges and Clerks in their private capacity. You send them a “Notice of Intent to Sue” and give them 10 days to respond. If they do not rebut your claim and provide proof of Jurisdiction then you file a default and then a criminal action in U.S. District court in your city. They will either dismiss the charges and drop everything or ignore you which is the same thing, Dismissed with prejudice. Read, copy and paste if you can this; Letter to Court or Public Servants

You are hereby NOTICED that I am a living soul standing ONLY under God, my Creator, protected by the legal jurisdiction of the PNLSB of North America, and thereby FREE to work in any common occupation of my choice without taxation and regulation by any Defacto State of the UNITED STATES. By making this response to you with this letter, I am NOTICING to you that I AM NOT conveying any authority of jurisdiction whatsoever to you or this Court. All sovereign Rights are perpetually reserved now and forever.

You are hereby NOTICED that I am not A Corporation, nor am I a U.S. citizen, nor a government created fiction, nor have I ever granted Power of Attorney over myself to the defacto State of the several states of the UNITED STATES or to any Court or its Judges to treat me as if I am a subject citizen, nor do I intend ever to do so in the future. I have NO CONTRACT obligation with the defacto State of any union STATE and NO CONTRACT with any Court or any Judge attempting to fraudulently impose obligations on me to the defacto State of this or any STATE, nor do I ever intend to have any such contracts, as such contracts would violate Sovereign Pembina Nation status and my contracts with my Creator from whom I received my UNALIENABLE Rights in the first place.

FOR AND ON THE RECORD, I hereby revoke, rescind, and void ab initio any and all supposed, alleged, assumed, or presumed signatures, autographs or marks of mine, that you or anyone might have on any non-disclosed contract in your possession without a lawful offer, acceptance, consideration or value provided by both parties, and without a meeting of the minds and full disclosure as to the nature of the contract. I hereby affirm that I would never knowingly, willingly, and voluntarily sign any contract with any State of the union of the UNITED STATES that would steal away my natural God-given Rights and replace those Rights with privileges granted by the State(s) for the purpose of their taxing me for my right to travel or work in a common occupation.

Points in fact:

1. You or your public servant has stopped a Sovereign Nation living member Man/Woman with first right claims upon the land he/she travels upon.
2. This living Man/Woman exists in a completely separate and lawfully distinct jurisdiction recognized by treaty with the UNITED STATES.
3. There are no crossings of the boundaries of jurisdiction where you can apply any laws of the civil and statutory codes of incorporation to the living Man/Woman.
4. State vehicle codes do not apply to the living Man/Woman because of the boundaries of jurisdiction between the incorporated states and the living as well as the recognition of treaty with the United States that cannot be lawfully crossed from the incorporated STATES over to the real world of the living Man/Woman within the jurisdiction of the Sovereign Nation, who travels as a matter of unalienable right within the kingdom of the one creator upon the land, water or air of the earth.
5. You as a Public Servant of any incorporated state operating under defacto color of law jurisdiction cannot cross the boundaries of jurisdiction from your world into the real world of the living Man/Woman because of the nature of a fiction that exists in name or on paper only I. E. Public Servant. The office of Public Servant you hold is a fictional office that is animated by the living Man/Woman who accepts the title of the office he/she holds. The laws of this office cannot be applied to the living Man/Woman, but only to another holding the fictional office of “person” or one who has accepted a privilege from a STATE in the form of a contract I. E. a State issued driver’s license.
6. In order for you to stop Me, you must first have a contract to do so. You have not produced a signed contract between You and Me.
7. For the living Man/Woman to be liable to the codes of the Corporation the living Man/Woman must be so named in the code(s) that you are attempting to apply to the living Man/Woman.
8. No contracts exist between your state and Me the living Man/Woman so there is no assumption of jurisdiction that you can rely upon to assume you have the authority to assume any jurisdiction and you have no authority to demand the living Man/Woman to enter into a contract with you or your STATE. I. E. Traffic Ticket/Citation. States operate in Contract Laws thus a citation is an offer of contract.
9. You will note that there is no STATE issued license plates on the living Man/Woman private property vehicle, which translates to no jurisdiction over the property by the Public Servant or the STATE. My Sovereign tag is Both my Flag and my Tag, and My Flag supersedes your flag by virtue of the Treaty of 1778 and the “Old Crossing Treaty of 1863” first right to the land.
10. As a living Man/Woman, retaining all God given sovereignty, I have not given permission, consent or authority to the Corporation of the STATE, therefore the STATE has no case.

Authority of the Public Servants and Courts.
Blacks Law Dictionary
1. Right
2. Permission

In order for a court to have the right to jurisdiction over a Man or Woman that court must operate in Common Law, which means that under Common Law all Rights are for and in the favor of the Man/Woman and not the Court.

In order for the Court to operate in statutory or Civil Codes or what is mistakenly known as laws against a Man/Woman, they must have permission from the Man/Woman to do so. The Courts operate in commerce, which is the code of contracts, not laws. Laws are reserved for Common Law.

(Revocable authority authors NOTE:)
In general, an authority is revocable, unless it is given as a security, or it be coupled with an interest. The revocation is either express or implied; when it is express and made known to the person authorized, the authority is at an end; the revocation is implied when the principal dies, or, if a Female, marries; or the subject of the authority is destroyed, as if a Man have/has authority to sell my house, and it is destroyed by fire or to buy for me a horse, and before the execution of the authority, the horse dies.

When once the agent has exercised all the authority given to him, the authority is at an end.

An authority is to be so construed as to include all necessary or usual means of executing it with effect and when the agent acts, avowedly as such, within his authority, he is not personally responsible.