The Republic is NOT Dead! Everyone has OPTED out!

For those of you that need “cold hard proof” that you have been defrauded, deceived, tricked, coerced, robbed, trespassed against, and victimized by the for-profit, defacto, corporate UNITED STATES plantation; have a look at this postcard I received today. Notice how it has no “stamp” yet it reached me just fine with apparently no postage due. Also, notice the included note in blue that was a message to me… I am honored if I helped him with his paperwork… but he was the one who had to do the heavy lifting (in other words no one can stand for your rights BUT you). Not “within”, but “without the UNITED STATES”.

If you never even try to stand up, how will you ever know what true freedom tastes like. I will tell you right now that there is a whole world that you have likely never known, but it is not too late to reclaim what is yours. There is no statute of limitations on fraud.

Postcard I received today.
Postcard I received today.

If you are a registered voter, you have volunteered to be enfranchised into the corporation. You need to let them know that you are not a US citizen (unless you were born in DC), because you are a Citizen of the state of the union in which you domicile (not reside). You know, the union of American states where each state in the republic was given the status of it’s own nation. You may be a little confused at this point. Keep reading to find out more. I will let Merle take it from here:

The court cases that I include below fortify the fact that U.S. citizens are “resident aliens” within their states of the Union that compose the Republic. I am also convinced that a foreign U.S. citizen of D.C. accepts citizenship in the corporate structure that operates within his state of the Union such as the 1857 “State of Iowa” that operates within the borders of the 1846 state called Iowa.

To lawfully achieve total freedom under common law, U.S. citizens have to wake up to the fact that they are citizens of “a sovereign occupying the position analogous to that of other sovereigns in the family of nations” such as red China and they are definitely not Citizens in the Republic consisting of the United States meaning “the collective name of the states which are united by and under the Constitution” . Under English common law you are a citizen of the country in which you were born for life (in my case Iowa) and you can never ever expatriate from your country in which you were born and you have no choice in the matter. Under the government’s Roman Civil law you can freely expatriate from your country of Michigan and voluntarily choose to become a citizen of any foreign jurisdiction if that jurisdiction will accept you as its citizen. The common law exists in the states while the Supreme Court has stated in Erie Railroad v. Thompkins that there is no federal general common law. The Supreme Court has also opined as follows:

The term “United States” may be used in any one of several senses. It may be merely the name of a sovereign occupying the position analogous to that of other sovereigns in the family of nations. It may designate the territory over which the sovereignty of the United States extends, or it may be the collective name of the states which are united by and under the Constitution. HOOVEN & ALLISON CO. v. EVATT, 324 U.S. 652 (1945): and

“The people of the United States resident within any State are subject to two governments: one State, and the other National; . . . . . The citizen cannot complain, because he has voluntarily submitted himself to such a form of government. He owes allegiance to the two departments, so to speak, and within their respective spheres must pay the penalties which each exacts for disobedience to its laws. ” U S v. CRUIKSHANK, 92 U.S. 542

This means the U.S. citizen has “voluntarily submitted himself” into being a foreign U.S. citizen and “subject” to two governments under Roman civil law. The Declaration of Independence says “deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.” U.S. citizens born in the states voluntarily provide consent for their just powers and don’t even realize their subject status by their citizenship in D.C. Continue reading “The Republic is NOT Dead! Everyone has OPTED out!”

Common Law Grand Jury: Who Is Working Against The American People?

Special thanks to Seiko Seven for this information.

My Note:I did not write this article, but I have referenced it in several writings over the years. It has for some reason, been scrubbed from the internet and I feel it is of great historical importance, and should be made available to anyone who wishes to study the true history of the united States of America as it has unfolded since her inception. The commonlawgrandjury.com site is no longer for some strange reason, and this information should not be lost or scrubbed.

Who is Working Against the American People?

An Essay about Suspension/Abrogation of the united States Constitution:

The Historical Timeline:

March 22, 1765 – Declaration of Rights of the Stamp Act Is Passed. The congress met for 12 days, including Sundays. There was no audience at the meetings, and no information about the deliberations was released during or after the congress. Their final product was called “The Declaration of Rights and Grievances”, and was drawn up by delegate John Dickinson of Pennsylvania. This Declaration raised fourteen points of colonial protest. In addition protesting to the Stamp Act issue, it asserted that colonists possessed all the rights of Englishmen, and that since they had no voting rights over Parliament, Parliament could not represent the colonists. Only the colonial assemblies had a right to tax the colonies. They also asserted that trial by jury was a right that the recent Admiralty Courts abused.

It is significant that in addition to simply arguing for their rights as Englishmen, they also asserted that they had certain natural rights solely because they were human beings. Resolution 3 stated, “That it is inseparably essential to the freedom of a people, and the undoubted right of Englishmen, that no taxes be imposed on them, but with their own consent, given personally, or by their representatives.” Both Massachusetts and Pennsylvania in separate resolutions would bring forth the issue even more directly when they referred, respectively, to “the Natural rights of Mankind” and “the common rights of mankind”.

1765. Boston Grand Jurors refused to indict the leaders of the Stamp Actriots, while in Williamsburg, Virginia, jurors assembled for the general court joined the mob that hanged the stamp master in effigy.

March 5, 1770. The Boston Massacre. The Boston Massacre was an incident that led to the deaths of five civilians at the hands of British troops on March 5, 1770, the legal aftermath of which helped spark the rebellion in some of the British American colonies, which culminated in the American Revolutionary War. A heavy British military presence in Boston led to a tense situation that boiled over into incitement of brawls between soldiers and civilians and eventually led to troops discharging their muskets after being attacked by a rioting crowd. Three civilians were killed at the scene of the shooting, eleven were injured, and two died after the incident.

In the year of 1770. Philadelphia’s Grand Jury took up the fight, and it went beyond the purely negative tactics of refusing to indict colonists and proposed a positive program of protest against the British tax on tea. The jurors denounced the use of the proceeds of the tea tax to pay salaries of royal officials in the colony. They declared their support of the non-importation agreement recently reached by the importers of Philadelphia and, in addition, recommended that Pennsylvania attempt to “promote union with the other colonies” in order to seek redress of their collective grievances. As a start for such co-operative action, the jurors pledged themselves to work for a united colonial program of non-consumption of British goods.

June 9, 1772 – The Gaspee Affair. HMS Gaspee and her hated commander, Lt. William Dudingston, were sent by King George III to Rhode Island waters in March of 1772 to enforce the trade laws and prevent smuggling. In a notorious act of defiance, American patriots attacked, boarded, looted, and torched the ship. This was a significant event in the lead-up to the American Revolution.

March 12, 1773. The Boston Tea Party

March 31, 1774. The Boston Port Act is passed by Parliament

May 20, 1774 – Administration of Justice and Massachusetts Government Acts are passed by Parliament

June 9, 1774 – Quartering Act is passed by Parliament

June 9, 1774 – First Continental Congress Convenes

October 7, 1774 – Quebec Act is passed by Parliament

October 14, 1774 – Declaration of Rights and Grievances is passed

October 20, 1774 – Articles of Association are signed

April 18, 1775 – American Revolutionary War (1775 – 1783)

May 10, 1775 – Second Continental Congress Convenes

June 7, 1776 – Richard Henry Lee Introduces Independence Resolution

July 21, 1775 – Ben Franklin Presents a Plan for Confederation

July 4, 1776 – Declaration of Independence Adopted

November 15, 1777 – Articles of Confederation Proposed

February 5, 1790 – Constitutional Convention.See: Philadelphia Convention, US Supreme Court’s third day of doing business here, (link not available)

It was supposed to be a government of the people, so with the advice and consent of the Senate, the President had appointed Justices of the Supreme Court. No other Constitutional qualifications or limitations exist for those who would be a Judge. The Supreme Court had to accept any person whom President Washington had appointed to be a member of that Court. If Judges, nominees by the President, weren’t required to be lawyers – those who practice before the Justices certainly did not have to be. The word lawyer and the qualification for them does not appear once in the Constitution. For good reason, the Constitution does not authorize the Courts to make rules for conducting its business. But as its first business, the Jay Court brazenly and unconstitutionally made and adopted Rules “as to the form of writs and as to the admission of counselors and attorneys.”

March 1, 1781 – Articles Of Confederation Ratified. Now the Articles of Confederation which were declared in force March 1, 1781 States in Article 12: “All bills of credit emitted, monies borrowed, and debts contracted by, or under the authority of Congress, before the assembling of the United States, in pursuance of the present confederation, shall be deemed and considered a charge against the United States, for payment and satisfaction whereof the said United States, and the public faith are hereby solemnly pledged.”

January 22, 1783. Congress ratified a contract for the repayment.Congress ratified a contract for the repayment of 21 loans that the UNITED STATES had already received dating from February 28, 1778 to July 5, 1782. Now the UNITED STATES Inc. owes the King money which is due January 1, 1788 from King George via France. King George funded both sides of the Revolutionary War. The Articles of Confederation acknowledge the debt owed to King George. Now after losing the Revolutionary War, even though the War was nothing more than a move to turn the people into debtors for the King, the conquest was not yet complete. Now the loans were coming due and so a meeting was convened in Annapolis, Maryland, to discuss the economic instability of the country under the Articles of Confederation. Only five States come to the meeting, but there is a call for another meeting to take place in Philadelphia the following year with the express purpose of revising the Articles of Confederation On February 21, 1787 Congress gave approval of the meeting to take place in Philadelphia on May 14, 1787, to revise the Articles of Confederation. Something had to be done about the mounting debt. Little did the people know that the so called founding fathers were going to reorganize the United States because it was Bankrupt (chapter 11). Continue reading “Common Law Grand Jury: Who Is Working Against The American People?”